This paper analyzes the applicability and relevance of internal quality measures presented and published in ISO/IEC standard for software quality. ISO/IEC Software engineering — Product quality was an international standard for the evaluation of software quality. It has been replaced by ISO/IEC. measures published in ISO/IEC standard for software quality measurement methodology is based on an in-depth analysis of the ISO/IEC

Author: Akinora Grogor
Country: Albania
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Relationship
Published (Last): 1 August 2014
Pages: 438
PDF File Size: 6.24 Mb
ePub File Size: 7.62 Mb
ISBN: 168-9-93468-997-1
Downloads: 6930
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Julkree

There can be other interrelation between criteria that were not considered in this study.

PD ISO/IEC TR 9126-3:2003

iso iec 9126-3 This ANP model is based on the criteria and sub-criteria which were introduced by previous researchers. Hence, E-learning quality is related to the quality of the web pages and web services Behkamal et al.

Attributes of software that bear on the opportunity for its adaptation to different specified environments without uec other actions or means than those provided iso iec 9126-3 this purpose for the software considered.

Table 2 shows these criteria with their sub criteria. Finally they made a table which shows a summary iso iec 9126-3 relationships Boehm and In, Perry showed that there was some interrelationship between quality factors.

Journal of Applied Sciences, Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback. In the field of E-learning systems selection, there are many attempts that have been done during more that 10 years.


ISO/IEC – Wikipedia

Moreover, his model included iso iec 9126-3 considerations about evaluation of software products with respect to utility of the program. International standards for HCI and usability. This standard is available for individual purchase. Also, for future researches we can consider priorities of 1926-3 makers.

A case study for a textile firm. Analytical network process for software iso iec 9126-3 in product development: Meeting user needs for quality.

All of these university provided high standard E-learning systems for student we have captured some information about their performance by conducting some interviews with students and staffs.

This process continue for about one month until January First, they review some literature on this subject and in second approach they conducted interview survey with people from industry. ANP developed by Thomas Saaty provides a way to input judgments and measurements iso iec 9126-3 derive ratio scale isp for the distribution of influence among the criteria and groups of criteria in the decision Saaty, Figure 2 shows that there are some relations iso iec 9126-3 4 main criteria.

ISO/IEC 9126

9216-3 So, we added other mentioned criteria such as learning community, System content and Personalization iso iec 9126-3 Wang model to ISO software quality model in order to evaluate E-learning systems. De Santo and A. Iso iec 9126-3 of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems. In addition, we considered same priority between decision makers moreover we created a Visual basic program to perform these calculations.


Attributes of software that iso iec 9126-3 on its ability to maintain iecc specified level of performance in case of software faults or of infringement of its specified interface. Among these researches, Wang identified 4 main criteria and 12 sub-criteria iso iec 9126-3 them. Information technology – Software quality characteristics and metrics – Part 3: Evaluation of the criteria and effectiveness of iwc E-learning with consistent fuzzy preference relations.

Instructions on How to use the Super Decisions Software. Suryn and Laverdiere presented a solution for methodically evaluating the internal quality of a soft switch. Many decision-making problems cannot be structured hierarchically because they have some dependency among their iso iec 9126-3. The objective of this standard is to provide a framework for the evaluation of software quality.

This may be done, for example, by specifying target values for quality metrics which evaluates the degree of presence of quality attributes. This part provides the concepts introduced in the original standard ie a recommended quality model which categorizes software quality in six characteristics, which are further sub-divided into subcharacteristics.